MEDIA WHORES will enable Bush-Rove FEAR-and-SMEAR Campaign 2006...

Former Air Force Lt.Col and Ph.D Karen Kwiatkowski: MEDIA WHORES *ENABLE* the Bush-Rove-Cheney FEAR-and-SMEAR Campaign of 2006...

<< My prediction is neither earth-shattering nor genius. But between now and the November elections, EVERY OPPORTUNITY to cause American EMOTION to TRUMP American INTELLECT, will be SEIZED, SQUEEZED, and SUSTAINED, by this administration and its HANDMAIDENS. [i.e. the cowardly Washington Post, the craven New York Times, and the superficial and lying corporate media coast-to-coast] >>

================================

Without reservation

Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D., Lt. Col. USAF (ret.)
posted 04 Sep 2006
http://militaryweek.com/columns/withoutreservation.php?id=46


Last week, the administration addressed the 88th annual national convention of the American Legion. Rumsfeld spoke on the 29th of August, and Bush swept up on the 31st preaching the gospel of ongoing and future military operations.


The American Legion is a busy organization of three million, with a full-time staff of 300, split between the heartland in Indianapolis and K Street, Washington, D.C. It is a solid Bush organization, and a convention in the capital of the reddest of Red States, should have been guaranteed to be hospitable to Bush. Pay no attention to the large anti-Bush rallies there and

the anti-war speech given by SLC Mayor Rocky Anderson that week.


Several years ago, the American Legion's monthly magazine featured an article entitled “The Principled Vice President Cheney.' By 2006, Americans and several billion other people around the world understood very well that Cheney had lied about the planning and motivations for the American invasion of Iraq. Most were also appalled that Cheney's Chief of Staff Scooter Libby was

indicted for lying to a grand jury on a national security case in 2005.


But members of the American Legion read the papers, and they do honestly care about national security, so the President rose to the challenge and laid it on thickly in his address. He described past, present and future wars in a glorious manner.


On past wars, Bush told the Legion that Afghanistan is newly democratic, and “… the future of Afghanistan belongs to freedom.' How nice for the Afghans, I'm sure. Pay no attention to the headlines in American newspapers speaking of the resurgence of both the Taliban and al Qaeda or the words of Bush's own government bemoaning an explosion in the production of opium in Afghanistan “despite hundreds of millions of [U.S.] dollars spent to reduce the opium.' And pay no attention to the continued fighting there.


On current wars, Bush told the Legion that Saddam Hussein is in jail, and the Iraqi people have their “sovereignty.' How nice for the Iraqis, I'm sure. He said, “America has a clear strategy to help the Iraqi people protect their new freedom, and build a democracy that can govern itself, and sustain itself, and defend itself.' Bush reported that he has been told, “only a small number of Iraqis are engaged in sectarian violence.' Pay no attention to the monthly Iraqi death count of between 1000 and 2000 dead civilians, or to the Pentagon's latest report that warns “Iraq on the brink of civil war.' .


On future wars, Bush told the Legion that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, is led by a radical regime, and is seeking nuclear weapons. Bush told the Legionnaires that Iran has to make a choice, and we have already made ours. Presumably this is the same deal we gave Saddam Hussein, although it remains to be seen on whether Bush can pull off another such military fiasco in Iran in the time he has left.


Bush's speech in Utah, suggestively subtitled, “Winning the Struggle Between Freedom and Terror in the Middle East,' was in fact all about failure. He spoke of past wars (failed and not over in Afghanistan), current wars (not only failing in Iraq, but spiraling into a hated occupation, perhaps civil war, and a certain cancer on the world's oil supply), and future wars (not planned, of course – not even the bullish-on-war Mr. Bush wants to be accused of planning something as stupid as preemptively bombing or invading Iran).


Yet even the crowd of patriotic veterans associated with the American Legion and its publications could see that. Even they can think. And because they can see, and because they can think, we may better understand Rumsfeld's speech, given a few days earlier to the same crowd.


This infamous Rumsfeld speechhas already produced Pentagon “explanations' and backpedaling. For me, one of his most problematic statements, in a speech filled with problematic statements is this one, where Rumsfeld warns that in long wars or struggles,


“…any kind of moral or intellectual confusion about who and what is right or wrong, can weaken the ability of free societies to persevere.'


In this case, Rumsfeld gets it exactly and precisely wrong. Let's summarize: Using dubious information and a whole lot of propaganda, we launched the destructive power of the world's most expensive and deadliest military on extremely weak fourth rate Middle Eastern countries of narrowly perceived strategic value in the name of promoting “democracy.' If we question this situation on moral, ethical, logical (when they vote freely, aren't we the ones who get voted off the island first?), strategic or constitutional grounds, according to Rumsfeld, we are ourselves the enemies of “freedom.'


But Bush and Rumsfeld are right about one thing. They believe that if Americans think about and assess the Bush administration wars – overseas and at home on the Constitution – Americans will cease any remaining support for continued military actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and potentially Iran. Rumsfeld and Bush believe that if we think, we will oppose their proposed military spending on same, and we will vote against politicians who have advocated such immoral, illegal, illogical, counter-strategic, and unconstitutional policies.


The Bush administration fears a true American legion – that growing multitude of thinking people who love this country and hate what Bush's foreign policy and domestic abuses are doing to it. This is why Rummy needed to chide, to threaten, and to name-call in a crowd of reliable and erstwhile supporters. Even in Salt Lake City, at an American Legion convention, people are increasingly morally or intellectually confused about what the Bush administration is doing around the world, and at home.


Last weeks' speeches indicate that Bush and Rumsfeld both know that if Americans become clear headed and logical, the Bush cabal loses and the party ends. Boldly unhampered by truth and increasingly menacing in tone, their words reveal panic and political desperation.

My prediction is neither earth-shattering nor genius. But between now and the November elections, every opportunity to cause American emotion to trump American intellect will be seized, squeezed and sustained by this administration and its handmaidens.