ANOTHER Anne Plummer Flaherty AP article that SHOULD read "Bush GETS his TORTURE powers wish"!

Yet ANOTHER example of AP, the American 'news' media, and Anne Plummer Flaherty TRYING TO MISLEAD, and MISINFORM readers!

In this case, a quick glance at the headline gives NO_INDICATION that this is a story about granting TORTURE POWERS to the US president (George W. Bush), unless one were already familiar with the 'news' of the past few weeks.

Notice how Republican Senators who STAND UP FOR over 100 years of American jurisprudence - that TORTURE is illegal, immoral, and un-American - are labelled as "REBELS," inherently giving a "SPIN" factor that Mr. Bush is in the mainstream or righteous position.

Well, Ms. Plummer-Flaherty demonstrates how "freedom" in America now means no more than "freedom" in any dictatorship or totalitarian regime... the "FREEDOM" to kow-tow to those in authority, and to spin a web of lies on their behalf.

Ms. Plummer-Flaherty may be writing the article as if the TORTURE powers that Mr. Bush is requesting are "CHRISTIAN" and within the framework of American jurisprudence, but almost certainly SHE would not want to be accidentally arrested - perhaps betrayed by a jealous neighbor or have her name shouted out by some other hapless torture victim trying to escape the pain and terror and saying the first names that came to mind - detained, tortured, and incarcerated INDEFINITELY, BEYOND THE REACH of law, judges, lawyers, or even her own family, as Mr. Bush is requesting the UN-CONTESTABLE POWER to do to ANYONE HE SO DESIRES.

========================================


Bush, GOP rebels said to be near accord
By ANNE PLUMMER FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer
21 Sept. 2006
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060921/ap_on_go_co/congress_terrorism


WASHINGTON - The Bush administration and rebellious GOP senators neared agreement Thursday on legislation setting terms for the interrogation and trial of suspects in the war on terror, congressional officials said.

ADVERTISEMENT

These officials said Stephen Hadley, the president's national security adviser, was meeting with key Republicans in hopes of sealing an agreement that could allow the legislation to clear Congress before lawmakers adjourn for elections.

President Bush's call for legislation has been deadlocked in an intraparty dispute, with Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, John Warner of Virginia and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina seeking a provision to make it clear that torture of suspects is barred.

Also at issue was whether suspects and their lawyers would be permitted to see any classified evidence in the cases against them.

Warner, McCain, Graham and Hadley met at mid-afternoon with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in the Capitol. The session came a few hours after Frist phoned the lawmakers and strongly urged them to reach a compromise after more than a week of Republican discord.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said in an e-mail there was not yet an agreement, but added, "Good trajectory. Stand by for confirmation."

No details of the emerging compromise were immediately available.

Nor was it clear how Senate Democrats might react.

An accord would fulfill a Republican political and legislative imperative — pre-election party unity on an issue related to the war on terror, and possible enactment of one of Bush's top remaining priorities of the year.

The evident compromise came less than a week after Bush emphatically warned lawmakers at a news conference he would shut down the interrogation of terror suspects unless legislation was sent to his desk. "Time's running out," he said.

The White House shifted its tone from combative to compromising within 48 hours, though, and officials began talking of a need for an agreement that all sides would be comfortable with.

Whatever the outcome, the controversy has handed critics of the president's conduct of the war on terror election-year ammunition.

Bush's former secretary of state, Colin Powell, dismayed the administration when he sided with Warner, McCain and Graham. He said Bush's plan, which would have formally changed the U.S. view of the Geneva Conventions on rules of warfare, would cause the world "to doubt the moral basis" of the fight against terror and "put our own troops at risk."

The handling of suspects is one of two administration priorities relating to the war on terror.

The other involves the president's request for legislation to explicitly allow wiretapping without a court warrant on international calls and e-mails between suspected terrorists in the United States and abroad. One official said Republicans had narrowed their differences with the White House over that issue, as well, and hoped for an agreement by day's end.

Republican leaders have said they intend to adjourn Congress by the end of the month to give lawmakers time to campaign for re-election.

The Supreme Court ruled in June that Bush's plan for trying terrorism suspects before military tribunals violated the Geneva Conventions and U.S. law.

The court, in a 5-3 ruling, found that Congress had not given Bush the authority to create the special type of military trial and that the president did not provide a valid reason for the new system. The justices also said the proposed trials did not provide for minimum legal protections under international law.

About 450 terrorism suspects, most of them captured in Afghanistan and none of them in the U.S., are being held by military authorities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Ten have been charged with crimes.