Wednesday, August 26, 2009

MORE on the Jewish-Dominated Washington Post WHITEWASHING GESTAPO TORTURE & Naziesque War Crimes....

WELL, they're AT IT AGAIN! The Washington Post CONTINUES to push its BLATANTLY NAZI-esque, "CONQUER THE WORLD IN DEFENSE OF THE REICH" agenda, and continues to FORGET all the bitching & moaning arguments its OWN (Jewish) Neo-Con writers & editors have used TO CRITICIZE the SAME TACTICS when they were used by the Nazi regime in Germany in the 1930s.

Washington Post Goes Judge Shopping in the Courthouse
By Melvin A. Goodman
The Public Record
Aug 25th, 2009
http://pubrecord.org/commentary/4081/washington-judge-shopping-courthouse/

The Washington Post continues to campaign against any accountability for the detentions policies of the Central Intelligence Agency, using its own editorials and oped writers as well as outsiders who support the efforts of the newspaper.

Today, one day after the release of the 2004 CIA inspector general report that documented the use of torture and abuse, a Post editorial actually claimed that “it’s impossible to say, on the basis of information made public so far, whether prosecution is warranted” and that, since the Bush Justice Department already declined prosecution, it would be “unsettling” to pursue even those CIA operatives who used “unauthorized, improvised, inhumane and undocumented” techniques.

The Post is willing to exonerate these operatives because they were “clamoring” constantly for guidance about what it should and should not do; in fact, CIA director George Tenet and Deputy Director John McLaughlin were more interested in protection than guidance.

On Monday, the paper went JUDGE-SHOPPING in the courthouse and published an op-ed by Jeffrey H. Smith, who is a well-known lawyer with Arnold & Porter, one of Washington’s most prestigious law firms. __Jeffrey H. Smith SERVED AS GENERAL COUNSEL [for] the CIA from May 1995 to September 1996.__
Smith created the most fatuous argument of all for not prosecuting the interrogators and apparently HAS NO UNDERSTANDING of the NUREMBERG LAWS, which declared that FOLLOWING ORDERS was NO DEFENSE and that CRIMEDS COMMITTED by INDIVIDUALS FOR STATE PURPOSES the responsibility of individuals and were __PUNISHABLE UNDER LAW__ [AS CRIMES]"

No comments: