NY Times War-pimp TOM FRIEDMAN auditions for the "Stupidest, most inane, most ghoulish Neo-Con" video....

ANOTHER post documenting ANOTHER journalistic ATROCITY of the New York Times!

In this case, their 'star' op-ed columnist and author, telling Iraq and the world to (literally, from Mr. Freidman's comments!) "SUCK ON THIS" !!

NEW YORK TIMES, Mr. Arthur Sulzberger... because of your entire decade of GROSSLY ATROCIOUS "reporting," on FAKE scandals from "Travel-office-gate" to "Lincoln bedroom" to "Hillary stole White House furniture" to "White House Trashing" to "Al Gore is a serial liar" to "IRAQ HAS WMDs!" - you are now the very embodiement of the ABJECT DISGRACE and slavish devotion to the corporatcracy military-industrial-complex imperialist-unilateral-aggression cheerleaders that American 'journalism' has degenerated to.

This video of "expert" commentator, author, and text-book Neo-Con war cheerleader THOMAS FRIEDMAN telling the people of Iraq "We (Americans) ATTACKED YOU because YOU WERE THE WEAKEST TARGET, and we needed to 'even the balance' [by attacking some country somewhere in the Mideast]" is just about the most despicable comment any neo-con has yet put to paper or video, in a field of champion ghouls, liars, and pasty-faced Chickenhawks who cheer, clap, and applaud every time an errant US bomb wipes out a wedding party.

And as one YouTube commenter posted, BOGGING DOWN THE ENTIRE US MILITARY in a war of grinding attrition, where a teenage street punk with a grenade or command-detonation mine ("IED"), paid $50 by his local guerrilla leaders, is ABLE TO TAKE OUT A TRAINED and equipped US infantryman (or entire Humvee squad), is committing that CLASSIC MILITARY MISTAKE of committing a small professional army to a large Asian land war - of making the enemies soldiers 1,000 times more potent than they were before the US invasion.